RE: he/she redux

Subject: RE: he/she redux
From: Annamaria Profit <inteltek2 -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 10:36:53 -0500

Dick, et al,
There's a sensitive issue with mailings to new mothers. I expect that your pediatrician friend has a good grip on the nuances, but I once had to hand-delete names from a baby formula company's direct mail database because they were inadvertently mailing "baby's first" birthday cards to *all* the mothers in the database, even the mothers whose babies had not survived their first year... The cards that the company sent out caused more than one mother serious flashback grief.

At 10:20 AM 3/26/02 -0500, Dick Margulis wrote:

"Jane Carnall" <jane -dot- carnall -at- digitalbridges -dot- com> wrote:

Jane, these are all written in the second person (to the mother). The particular subject is breastfeeding technique, so the father is not addressed. All third person pronouns refer to the baby.


Annamaria Profit
E-mail: inteltek2 -at- earthlink -dot- net
"Where it is possible, live in peace with all men."
(Romans 12:18)

PC Magazine gives RoboHelp Office 2002 five stars - a perfect score!
"The ultimate developer's tool for designing help systems. A product
no professional help designer should be without." Check out RoboHelp at

Check out the TECHWR-L Site redesign!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: he/she redux: From: Dick Margulis

Previous by Author: Fwd: traffic mgmt--an addendum
Next by Author: Re: Ethical Companies (no flame wars, please)
Previous by Thread: RE: he/she redux
Next by Thread: RE: he/she redux

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads