RE: techwr-l digest: June 13, 2002

Subject: RE: techwr-l digest: June 13, 2002
From: David Handy <davidh -at- automsoft -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:16:16 +0100

One reason I (mostly) lurk is that I receive the list in digest form; often
when I am prompted to respond to a post, I see that someone else has
responded adequately or made the same point ahead of me.

A list like this live or dies by its contributors; a large pool of eager and
knowledgeable contributors makes for a great list. But we can't expect
people to post for the sake of it. If "lurking" means that someone
subscribes to the list and learns by reading its posts, that's fine by me.

-----Original Message-----

<<I'd like to poll the lurkers. My question: Why lurk?>>

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

Check out RoboDemo for tutorials! It makes creating full-motion software
demonstrations and other onscreen support materials easy and intuitive.
Need RoboHelp? Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in May with our mail-in rebate.
Go to
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: MA in English or engineering classes?
Next by Author: RE: techwr-l digest: June 13, 2002 [RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers]
Previous by Thread: Re: HTML-format e-mail newsletters?]
Next by Thread: Re: Why Lurk?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads