Re: craft vs. science

Subject: Re: craft vs. science
From: Goober <techcommgoober -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:27:45 -0700 (PDT)

> Well, you started the thread with a post that
> included the line, "Why?
> Because I have a process. If it were craft, I'd be
> King Workaround, Lord
> of the Makeshifts." I read that as a mild
> deprecation of craft. If it
> wasn't intended that way, I apologize to you; but I
> think it led to some
> interesting discussion in any case.

It sure did! Sometimes you have to tap the glass to
get the fish to move. *lol*

My point with this thread was to lead up to the notion
that a lot of what we do *can* be put to rigid
process, but still a lot is left to uncertainty.

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup

Check out RoboDemo for tutorials! It makes creating full-motion software
demonstrations and other onscreen support materials easy and intuitive.
Need RoboHelp? Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in May with our mail-in rebate.
Go to

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: craft vs. science: From: Dick Margulis

Previous by Author: RE: craft vs. science
Next by Author: RE: craft vs. science
Previous by Thread: Re: craft vs. science
Next by Thread: RE: craft vs. science

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads