RE: craft vs. science

Subject: RE: craft vs. science
From: Goober <techcommgoober -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:11:09 -0700 (PDT)

> And, yes, the process is sort of scientific, until
> you toss in the
> variables, deadlines, resources, flaky software, and
> judgement of
> document (online and printed) design . . ..
> I'd say, there's an art, if not a craft, to the
> science of technical
> writing. If you disagree, try writing a 600-page
> software manual, using
> section numbers, lots of numbered lists, TOC, IX, in
> MS Word, and then
> port it to online help via RoboHelp . . . you'll see
> that craftiness and
> workarounds and intelligent application of your
> skills become a
> necessity.

I'll agree with that. :)

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

Check out RoboDemo for tutorials! It makes creating full-motion software
demonstrations and other onscreen support materials easy and intuitive.
Need RoboHelp? Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in May with our mail-in rebate.
Go to
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: craft vs. science: From: Sean Brierley

Previous by Author: RE: craft vs. science
Next by Author: Re: craft vs. science
Previous by Thread: RE: craft vs. science
Next by Thread: RE: craft vs. science

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads