Re: Intentional fallacy (was Re: Contact off-list/on-list)

Subject: Re: Intentional fallacy (was Re: Contact off-list/on-list)
From: Emily Berk <emily -at- armadillosoft -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 07:52:17 -0700

So, Dick, you are calling me a liar, both off-list and on?

Do you claim that that I DO hate you, or that I always forward off-list posts to the list or that I DO know you -- DO I know you?


At 10:36 AM 6/29/02 -0400, Dick Margulis wrote:

>Rhetoric is a subject near and dear to the hearts of techwrlers, and Emily's post--the second in a row in which her reading of my words differs substantively from what I thought I wrote--led me to type "intentional fallacy"--a term recalled from that ancient realm called English 119--into Google.

and on and on at length....

~ Emily Berk ~
~ On the web at *** Armadillo Associates, Inc. ~
~ Internet and non-internet application development, project ~
~ management, developer relations and extremely-technical technical ~
~ documentation that developers find useful. ~

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.
Save $600: Create great-looking Help files and software demos with
RoboHelp Deluxe. Get RoboHelp and RoboDemo - our new demo software - for one
low price. OR Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in June with our mail-in rebate.
Go to
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Intentional fallacy (was Re: Contact off-list/on-list): From: Dick Margulis

Previous by Author: Contact off-list/on-list (was Re: SLAVE labor?...)
Next by Author: Re: An Editor's Role...To Punish the Writer?
Previous by Thread: Intentional fallacy (was Re: Contact off-list/on-list)
Next by Thread: Re: Intentional fallacy (was Re: Contact off-list/on-list)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads