RE: [Fwd: Re: Thanks re Quark v. FrameMaker -- and one more question ...]

Subject: RE: [Fwd: Re: Thanks re Quark v. FrameMaker -- and one more question ...]
From: "Dick Margulis " <margulis -at- mail -dot- fiam -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:30:58 -0400


"Sean Brierley" <sbri -at- haestad -dot- com> wrote:


>
>Okay, RageMaker 7.01 is better and more robust for long docs. But, what
>do you think about the consultant's recommendation?
>

Sean,

Quoting from the post of mine that you replied to:

> (NOTE: I am not defending the use of PageMaker for this situation).

I agree with everyone else that, even though I have never used Frame, if I couldn't have Interleaf, Frame would be my first choice for the gig that this thread relates to.

Dick



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.
Save $600: Create great-looking Help files and software demos with
RoboHelp Deluxe. Get RoboHelp and RoboDemo - our new demo software - for one
low price. OR Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in June with our mail-in rebate.
Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: distiller/fonts
Next by Author: Re: Setting up a Tech Comm Department
Previous by Thread: RE: [Fwd: Re: Thanks re Quark v. FrameMaker -- and one more question ...]
Next by Thread: Free/open source knowledge base system


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads