RE: Re(2): Slow Tech Writers

Subject: RE: Re(2): Slow Tech Writers
From: Daniel -dot- Glovier -at- ubsw -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:20:29 -0400


Letoured,

Your last two replies to Jan and Cindy come off a bit hostile, and a bit arrogant. This is a list where questions are answered, information is distributed, and support given to comrades in words. Last time I checked, this isn't a forum for touting one industry over another.

Now, we all have a variety of circumstances we are trying to overcome, and we all do our best at it. You included. Just because you are given the luxury of generous schedules does not mean that your way is the correct way. The correct way is the one that produces the best possible documentation for the situation given.

And for the last time, slow does not equate with careful. Slow is a measurement of pace. Careful is a measurement of accuracy. They are not mutually inclusive, nor are they mutually exclusive.

Now, if you're stating that your manuals require much more study, research, and time than your average software manual, then that is your "normal" pace. I am sure that even in your industry that there are slow and fast "flavors" of writers. And I'm sure some writers who are more accurate than others, with you apparently leading the way.

I'm glad that you're stoked about your industry and your talents, but do not make sweeping assessments on the talents and skills of others. It does you an injustice.

-Dan
"Genius late is genius lost." - Me

Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.
Save $600: Create great-looking Help files and software demos with
RoboHelp Deluxe. Get RoboHelp and RoboDemo - our new demo software - for one
low price. OR Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in June with our mail-in rebate.
Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Looking for advice -- up to the job?
Next by Author: RE: Fw: Why do we put so many warnings in our manuals?
Previous by Thread: RE: Re(2): Slow Tech Writers
Next by Thread: RE: Re(2): Slow Tech Writers


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads