Re: "Obvious" warnings - drawing the line

Subject: Re: "Obvious" warnings - drawing the line
From: Peter <pnewman1 -at- optonline -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 11:40:46 -0400

letoured -at- together -dot- net wrote:
> That would come under the doctrine of comparative negligence... So the URL on
> the lawsuit where the worker was successful is what?

Not even close to comparative negligence. I never said the worker was
successful. The case was one that I successfully defended in my former
life. But, it cost a substantial amount of money to defend and should
never have been started. Lawyers are coming up with novel theories upon
which ot bas their lawsuits.


"When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a
minute. But let him sit on a hot stove for a minute-and it's
longer than any hour. That's relativity,"
- Einstein-

Want to support TECHWR-L? Get shirts, bags, hats, clocks,
and more from the TECHWR-L Store. All proceeds support TECHWR-L.

Save up to 50% with RoboHelp Deluxe. Get 2 great products for 1 low price!
You'll get RoboHelp Office PLUS RoboDemo, the software demonstration tool
that everyone's been talking about. Check it out and save!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Re: "Obvious" warnings - drawing the line: From: letoured

Previous by Author: Re: "Obvious" warnings - drawing the line
Next by Author: Re: "Obvious" warnings - drawing the line
Previous by Thread: Re: "Obvious" warnings - drawing the line
Next by Thread: Re: "Obvious" warnings - drawing the line

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads