Glossary Predicament!

Subject: Glossary Predicament!
From: "Dinesh Nair" <nair1975 -at- rediffmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: 13 Aug 2002 10:49:08 -0000

I am preparing a product guide for a wireless billing software. Do you guys think it would be a good idea to explain terms like 3G, 2.5g, 2g and IN in the glossary? Since the product guide would be read by people who would like to know the benefits of the software, do I assume the reader would be already familiar with these terms?

Right now I am thinking insulting the reader's intelligence is a far smaller risk than trying the reader's patience. Would like to know this list's opinion.

Want to support TECHWR-L? Get shirts, bags, hats, clocks,
and more from the TECHWR-L Store. All proceeds support TECHWR-L.

Save up to 50% with RoboHelp Deluxe. Get 2 great products for 1 low price!
You'll get RoboHelp Office PLUS RoboDemo, the software demonstration tool
that everyone's been talking about. Check it out and save!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: Pls snd citations re title User Guide
Next by Author: Re: On-Line Vs. Print, Single-Sourcing, and how to ignore the obvious
Previous by Thread: RE: Looking for the name of a key on the keyboard
Next by Thread: Re: Glossary Predicament!

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads