Re: Documentation Quality Metrics

Subject: Re: Documentation Quality Metrics
From: SteveFJong -at- aol -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:18:15 EDT

First, for the political neophytes among you, never respond to a request from
your boss with an airy "That's a ridiculous request, it can't be done." It
doesn't curry favor 8^) Besides, everybody else is doing it, so why can't we?
Actually, we can. There is an STC Quality SIG whose URL is:

I contribute to the SIG and its newsletter. I have written a survey article
on documentation quality metrics, listing some 50 metrics:

-- Steve

Steven Jong--"Typo? What tpyo?"
mailto:SteveFJong -at- AOL -dot- com -dot- nospam
Home sweet home page:

Want to support TECHWR-L? Get shirts, bags, hats, clocks,
and more from the TECHWR-L Store. All proceeds support TECHWR-L.

Check out the new release of RoboDemo, our easy-to-use tutorial software.
Plus, buy RoboHelp Office in August and save $100 with our mail-in rebate.
Get details and download free trial versions at

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: NPR program on bad writing
Next by Author: Re: Pleasing a Manager
Previous by Thread: RE: Documentation Quality Metrics
Next by Thread: OT: Well, not really...

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads