RE: Knowledge Management

Subject: RE: Knowledge Management
From: "Sean Brierley" <sbri -at- haestad -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:19:09 -0400

Base terminology?

Maybe I misunderstood, but I thought the original poster was looking for
a tad more than a definition? If all the original poster was looking for
was a definition, or three, then I think there'd have been no guff or



Sean Brierley
Software Documentation Specialist
Haestad Methods
203-805-0572 (voice)
203-597-1488 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From: Rebecca Downey [mailto:rdowney -at- matrox -dot- com]

Dear Writer not-so-technical,
As you probably have surmised, the list is not very forgiving of those
ask simple questions on base terminology. It's nothing personal but it
seem to be habitual to most all technical writers (myself included) in
since searching for knowledge is so key to our profession, those that do
display a basic understanding of *how* to search quickly get belittled.

Check out the new release of RoboDemo, our easy-to-use tutorial software.
Plus, buy RoboHelp Office in August and save $100 with our mail-in rebate.
Get details and download free trial versions at

Acrobat & FrameMaker Seminars: PDF Best Practices, FrameMaker-to-Acrobat
Advanced Techniques, FM Template Design, Single Sourcing with FrameMaker
in Brussels (Oct), and in Montreal & Dallas (Dec):

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Knowledge Management
Next by Author: RE: Knowledge Management
Previous by Thread: RE: Knowledge Management
Next by Thread: RE: Knowledge Management

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads