RE: Frame&SGML: looking for opinions of current users

Subject: RE: Frame&SGML: looking for opinions of current users
From: "Gilger.John" <JGilger -at- acresgaming -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 08:55:30 -0700

Per Bruce's request:

Gilger.John wrote:
> Bruce,
> You're asking a propriatary software producer to commit the ultimate sin -- admit that open source products are superior to what they produce :)
> I used FM6+SGML at work for a while, but went back to emacs in the sgml mode and DocBook. It works better. The only useful function that FM provides is a graphical user interface, but it is unnecessary once you are comfortable with emacs.
> FM would be nice if DocBook was the default.

Funny - I've come to the same conclusion about what to use - and I don't
even like emacs

BTW - would you post your comment to the list? It never hurts to remind
people that open source solutions are out there..

Experience RoboHelp X3! This new RoboHelp release combines single sourcing,
print-quality documentation, conditional text and much more, into the most
monumental release of RoboHelp ever!

Absolutely FREE! FrameMaker/Win 6 & 7 Express Customization (v3):
Quick-access buttons & keys to common functions, char tag/font drop-down
lists, charset browser, QRef guides & much more:

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Off-site work
Next by Author: RE: screen capturing
Previous by Thread: Re: Frame&SGML: looking for opinions of current users
Next by Thread: Creating a Navigation Chart

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads