Re: More on drafts --

Subject: Re: More on drafts --
From: kcronin -at- daleen -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:30:47 -0600

David wrote:

> The original post, though, was about how to deal with a manager who
> didn't understand why that particular writer used the "brainstorm"
> method rather than the "outline" method. To that manager, an early
> snapshot of the document seemed haphazard, unorganized, and generally
> unacceptable.

Understood. But my comment was aimed some recent participants in this
thread, who seem in their own way as pedantic as that manager. Different
strokes, I guess...

Keith Cronin

This message was written without using an outline. However, it was
composed while staring at a picture of the Hackos book on Amazon and
simultaneously thinking snorky thoughts about Andrew Plato's car. So that
should explain the quality of its content. Or something.

Enhance, optimize and automate your FrameMaker-to-PDF workflow with TimeSavers:
Define all PDF features in your source FrameMaker files ONCE, distill MANY.
Bookmark Controller, Link Controller, UnBloat & more :

Experience RoboHelp X3! This new RoboHelp release combines single sourcing,
print-quality documentation, conditional text and much more, into the most
monumental release of RoboHelp ever!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: More on drafts --
Next by Author: Re: A grand, grand opening line...
Previous by Thread: Re: More on drafts --
Next by Thread: Re: More on drafts --

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads