RE: Solicitation for opinions on an XML WYSIWYG (was: xml/docbbok editors)

Subject: RE: Solicitation for opinions on an XML WYSIWYG (was: xml/docbbok editors)
From: "Erika Yanovich" <ERIKA_y -at- rad -dot- co -dot- il>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 16:03:01 +0300

Working with tags is offputting, programming is out of scope for some TWs, so it sounds like a dream system. From the writer/manager perspective, the pro is that the writer learns to use a new tool, the con is that the actual writing is more boring. Devil's advocate: the manuals will lack some of the "glue" that makes the flow more easily digestable. It is not clear how much tweaking will a manual need if using such a system.

All-new RoboHelp X3 is now shipping! Get single sourcing, print-quality
documentation, conditional text and much more, in the most monumental
release ever. Save $100! Order online at

Buy ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 6.0, the most powerful SINGLE SOURCE HELP
AUTHORINGTOOL for MS Word. SAVE $100 on the full version and $50 on upgrades.
Offer ends Oct 31, 02 (code: DTH102250).

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Which class
Next by Author: RE: Thesis Project
Previous by Thread: Re: Having a killer resume
Next by Thread: RE: perils of job hunting

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads