Re: observation of tech writer status

["Dick Margulis " <margulis -at- mail -dot- fiam -dot- net>]

Bruce Byfield <bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com> wrote:


> Unless 
>you have content, your writing ability doesn't count for much. A good 
>tech-writer (or writer of any kind, for that matter), needs hybrid skills.

And had you not quoted me out of context, Bruce, it would be obvious to all that we agree on this.


> If division of labor is going to work, it requires some 
>generalists who understand the whole picture. Some of those generalists 
>should be managers and directors (although, all too often, they aren't). 
>Others are tech-writers.
>

Again, we agree. But a generalist's knowledge is not necessarily an expert's knowledge; and what I argued in my previous post on this topic was that one person cannot be expected to have expertise in all aspects of a large, complex system--which seems to be what Andrew is asking for and what you agreed with him about.

Dick

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!

All-new RoboHelp X3 is now shipping! Get single sourcing, print-quality
documentation, conditional text and much more, in the most monumental
release ever. Save $100! Order online at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.