RE: Bouncing Reality Checks

Subject: RE: Bouncing Reality Checks
From: KMcLauchlan -at- chrysalis-its -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 12:55:33 -0500

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike O. [mailto:obie1121 -at- yahoo -dot- com]
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:52 PM

> > THE Subject Matter Expert on this particular capability
> > asked, "Do we want this documentation to be 100% accurate?
> > Or is pretty close good enough for our needs?" It seems
> > that he was concerned with whether or not he actually needed
> > to review the documentation...

> I'd tell him I tested it and it's already 100% accurate.

Careful. Somebody might record a little statement
like that and fling it back in your face at a later
date... say, your performance review, just as one
of your biggest customers is raising a stink about
the botched documentation...

... not that I'm speaking from experience or anything...


Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!

Order RoboHelp X3 in December and receive $100 mail in rebate, FREE WebHelp
Merge Module and the new RoboPDF - add powerful PDF output functionality
to RoboHelp X3. Order online today at

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: Bouncing Reality Checks
Next by Author: RE: Bouncing Reality Checks
Previous by Thread: Re: Bouncing Reality Checks
Next by Thread: RE: Bouncing Reality Checks

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads