RE: Tree View Terminology

Subject: RE: Tree View Terminology
From: "Anita Legsdin" <anita -dot- legsdin -at- watchmark -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:45:55 -0800

Then it seems to follow that if the unnamed region of the window is too
complex to point to easily, the window itself is poorly designed? I like
that philosophy. But what about the case where a hierarchy of folders
can be displayed or not (as in "The Outlook Bar"), or can be configured
by the user to be either on the left side, or on top? You pretty much
have to name it, then, to save words.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gordon Meyer [SMTP:gordonmeyer -at- mac -dot- com]
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 7:37 AM
> Subject: Re: Tree View Terminology
> I'd be inclined to avoid naming the view. Just describe what it
> provides. Along the lines of "On the left side of the window, click
> the
> triangles to view or hide the contents of each folder." If you feel
> compelled to explain that folders can be nested, then add an
> additional
> sentence to that affect, but I wonder that it might not be necessary
> at
> all, depending on the context of the task you're describing.
> --Gordon
Anita Legsdin
Sr. Technical Writer
(425) 564-8135

"Don't bother trying to make something foolproof. Nature will simply
evolve a better fool."


Buy or upgrade to RoboHelp X3 today and receive the WebHelp
Merge Module for FREE ($299 value). RoboHelp X3's all-new
features include conditional text, completely re-engineered
printed documentation output, Context-sensitive Help Toolkit,
single-source layouts, and more!
Order online today at

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: Am I qualified to be a Technical Writer based on my knowledge?
Next by Author: RE: but is thinking required also?
Previous by Thread: RE: Tree View Terminology
Next by Thread: Re: Tree View Terminology

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads