RE: Outlook for the future

Subject: RE: Outlook for the future
From: holmegm -at- attbi -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 12:31:50 +0000

Jim Shaeffer <jims -at- spsi -dot- com> wrote:

{snip copied text from 1993 post}

>The above is copied from this post to TECHWR-L.
>It was posted in 1993.
>I didn't look very hard to find it. I'll bet I could find even better
>examples of ten year old posts saying pretty much the same things as the
>posts in this current thread.

Except ... that this person was making a prediction. In this thread, I
and others have described the *current* state of affairs.

I think that the person you are quoting was just a bit ahead of his time.
Well, except for the document server part - hmmm, unless you consider web
servers document servers ... who *is* this Nostradamus you quote? He's
amazing! ;)

Greg Holmes


Buy or upgrade to RoboHelp X3 today and receive the WebHelp
Merge Module for FREE ($299 value). RoboHelp X3's all-new
features include conditional text, completely re-engineered
printed documentation output, Context-sensitive Help Toolkit,
single-source layouts, and more!
Order online today at

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: Outlook for the future
Next by Author: Re: RoboPdf
Previous by Thread: Re: Outlook for the future
Next by Thread: Re: Outlook for the future

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads