Re: brief release history of FrameMaker

Subject: Re: brief release history of FrameMaker
From: GeneK <gene -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:28:03 -0800

Don't know what their plans for future FM releases are, but the people I know who they cut in San Jose
were fairly senior members of the UI development team, not just programmers. And they specifically
said that "development" was being moved, not just programming.

Gene Kim-Eng

At 12:00 PM 2/18/2003 -0500, bethany_rusbasan -at- leco -dot- com wrote:

I believe a lot of companies outsource to India due to inexpensive labor.

Usually the outsourced code is when they're making smaller changes to a product, not when they've making overhauls. And usually management of the project stays in the U.S. and some of the coding is still done here. Are they "moving" to India? They may just have hired some programmers in India to work on some parts of it.


Buy or upgrade to RoboHelp X3 today and receive the WebHelp
Merge Module for FREE ($299 value). RoboHelp X3's all-new
features include conditional text, completely re-engineered
printed documentation output, Context-sensitive Help Toolkit,
single-source layouts, and more!
Order online today at

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: brief release history of FrameMaker: From: bethany_rusbasan

Previous by Author: Re: brief release history of FrameMaker
Next by Author: RE: Concepts (was Technical Writing Tests)
Previous by Thread: Re: brief release history of FrameMaker
Next by Thread: Re: brief release history of FrameMaker

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads