Re: Gender neutral - any new developments in your neck of thewoods?

Subject: Re: Gender neutral - any new developments in your neck of thewoods?
From: dmbrown -at- brown-inc -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 12:53:59 -0800


eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com wrote:
>
> ...if using 'he' excludes women, then I think that it's only right
> to point out that 'she' excludes men.

Ah, well, I'm a believer in affirmative action.

>
> You are trying to make the point that numerous years of standard
> usage of 'he' is incorrect because it excluded women.

You overextend. He meant making a point about some specific use of "she" in a particular sentence in which it appears.

>
> You are trying to make a PC point by the use of 'she'.

Only if PC stands for "personal choice." When I need to use THIRD person singular :) I simply choose to use "she" instead of "he"--no big deal.

>
> I question...why anyone would get hot and bothered
> arguing for the use of she.

Who's hot and bothered? I just answered a post about the use of "they" as a singular pronoun. Like lots of others who answered, I described my alternative to what many folks find awkward and disruptive. You don't have to like my alternative or theirs to make it OK.

>
> How long is until someone thinks that writing an office manual using
> exclusively 'she' is demeaning because it stereotypes women into the job?

Pardon? Office manuals contained language like this for decades:

"The secretary should carry her steno pad to all meetings," and
"The manager should review his direct reports at least once a year."

People SHOULD think it's demeaning, because it IS. What was even more demeaning was that only women got hired as secretaries, and only men got to be managers.

Whether this is still on topic is *also* a matter of opinion, so I'm bowing out before Eric expresses his.

:)

--David

========================================================================

HTML Indexer 4 is still the easiest way to create and maintain indexes
for web sites, intranets, HTML Help, JavaHelp, and other HTML documents.

HTML Indexer 4 includes fully integrated cross-references, target frames
and windows, multiple-file output, "one-step accept" of default entries,
and more!

http://www.html-indexer.com/

 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Order RoboHelp Office X3 by March 14 and receive a $100 mail-in rebate,
plus FREE WebHelp Merge Module and FREE iMarkup Software, for a
total giveaway value of $439! Order today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/special/contests/
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Re: Gender neutral - any new developments in your neck of the woods?: From: eric . dunn

Previous by Author: Re: Gender neutral - any new developments in your neck of the woods?
Next by Author: Re: Category vs. Alphabetical Listing in Contents Tab in Online Help
Previous by Thread: Re: Gender neutral - any new developments in your neck of the woods?
Next by Thread: RE: Gender neutral - any new developments in your neck of the woods?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads