RE: list squabble

Subject: RE: list squabble
From: jbfoster <jb -dot- foster -at- shaw -dot- ca>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 16:38:27 -0700

... I agree with Bill!

I agree that Andrew is a bit controversial - but f you have a problem with
him posts, then delete them or complain to the moderator ... or both. These
attacks on his character are highly unprofessional!


Bill Swallow wrote:

> Can we focus on topics and not those posting them, please? If you have
> proof to counter what he posts, by all means, do post it. But if you
> just don't like reading his diatribes, then don't read them. You can
> delete the messages, or set up a rule to filter them out. Posting
> messages like the rant I decided to omit from this message does nothing
> at all to aid the technical writing community.

Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here:

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: list squabble: From: Bill Swallow

Previous by Author: RE: Visio - Complex Flow Chart
Next by Author: RE: Reading level (was RE: Principles for procedure writing)
Previous by Thread: RE: list squabble
Next by Thread: RE: Article: "Living Documentation"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads