RE: who is responsible

Subject: RE: who is responsible
From: Sean Brierley <seanb_us -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 07:49:12 -0700 (PDT)

I was actually told that I am responsible but am not
to have the authority. I think I managed to get that
into some meeting notes. Nobody objected.




--- Paul Hanson <PHanson -at- Quintrex -dot- com> wrote:
> Re: the recent "who is responsible" thread:
> I agree with Andrew. Here, The buck stops with me. I
> like what someone wrote
> about professionals that don't really care *who* is
> to blame, they just want
> to fix it and move on.

Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here:

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: who is responsible: From: Paul Hanson

Previous by Author: Re: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
Next by Author: Re: EHelp's Deceptive Email Practice
Previous by Thread: RE: who is responsible
Next by Thread: Re: who is responsible

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads