Re: "found" TW humor (low)

Subject: Re: "found" TW humor (low)
From: "Bonnie Granat" <bgranat -at- editors-writers -dot- info>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 02:35:22 -0400

The following text appears in Karen Wright's article, "very Dark Energy"at

"In the last 75 years, astronomers have radically revised their conception of
the cosmos. Edwin Hubble showed in 1929 that the universe was not static but
expanding- it was getting bigger all the time, as if some primal explosion
were driving its contents apart. That primal explosion came to be known as the
Big Bang, and the expanding universe was its love child. For 50 years, Big
Bang cosmology reigned."

Is it even conceivable (you should pardon the expression) that she thinks "Big
Bang" means "Big Fcuk"?

We technical writers may be lazy morons, but would we make an error like this?

Bonnie Granat
Granat Editorial Services

Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here:

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


"found" TW humor (low): From: Sella Rush

Previous by Author: Re: Viral attachment notifications
Next by Author: Re: "found" TW humor (low)
Previous by Thread: "found" TW humor (low)
Next by Thread: Re: "found" TW humor (low)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads