RE: When a "shim" is not a "shim"

Subject: RE: When a "shim" is not a "shim"
From: "Stevenson, Rebecca" <Rebecca -dot- Stevenson -at- workscape -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:41:13 -0400


-----Original Message-----
From: MList -at- chrysalis-its -dot- com [mailto:MList -at- chrysalis-its -dot- com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 10:39 AM
Subject: RE: When a "shim" is not a "shim"

word processors or... or...

This shim-that's-not-a-shim just makes the standard
functionality available on a couple of systems where it
would not otherwise work. Er... I mean... that's what
they tell me, over at that ... um... other company. Yeah.


Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here:

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: The Law of Unintended Consequences
Next by Author: RE: Reader responsibility
Previous by Thread: RE: When a "shim" is not a "shim"
Next by Thread: RE: When a "shim" is not a "shim"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads