RE: certification

Subject: RE: certification
From: holmegm -at- attbi -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 13:10:07 +0000

John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com> wrote:

>Greg...I've seen administering done by organizations that are associated
>with, but separate from the trade association. An example being Institute of
>Certified Records Managers being associated with the Association for Records
>Managers and Administrators. In this way, costs are separate and supported
>only by those who wish to be credentialed. The money from this support comes
>from exam fees, membership fees, publications, etc. If you don't want to be
>credentialed, then you can continue to do what you do with no cost

That's a possibility. Who do you see as filling that role, for the
certification that you envision? The STC, another existing organization, or a
new organization?

Greg Holmes

Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here:

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: certification
Next by Author: Re: Why? Here's Why!
Previous by Thread: RE: certification
Next by Thread: RE: certification

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads