RE: certification

Subject: RE: certification
From: "Jim Shaeffer" <jims -at- spsi -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:18:31 -0400

The STC has abandoned its Certification initiative. It could not get
support from a majority of the memberbership (for the idea of
certification, let alone for a detailed program) and it could not see
any way to fund a costly, on-going certification program.
Note: The above are my observations and interpretations from observing
STC conference sessions and reading official pronouncements

Jim Shaeffer (jims -at- spsi -dot- com)

> That's a possibility. Who do you see as filling that role, for the
> certification that you envision? The STC, another existing
> organization, or a new organization?
> --
> Greg Holmes

Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here:

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: "technology isn't just for geeks" presentation - ideas?
Next by Author: RE: Certification is absurd
Previous by Thread: Re: Certification
Next by Thread: RE: certification

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads