RE: phone interviews

Subject: RE: phone interviews
From: "Downing, David" <DavidDowning -at- Users -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:52:14 -0500

I don't agree. I'd call this lying by exclusion.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Posada [mailto:writer -at- tdandw -dot- com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: phone interviews

There's no secrecy...if you ask, you are told. If you don't, you aren't...just like any number of other interview questions for which you will get answers only if you ask and you won't if you don't.

John Posada
Senior Technical Writer

----- Original Message -----
From: "Goober Writer" <gooberwriter -at- yahoo -dot- com>
Subject: Re: phone interviews

> I'm not up to snuff on my employment and interview
> legalese, but I do see some professional courtesy
> issues with that. Really, why the secrecy?
> Interviewing with multiple people is normal and should
> be disclosed.



RoboHelp for FrameMaker is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to online Help, intranet, and Web.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! Call 800-718-4407 for
competitive pricing or download a trial at:

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: phone interviews
Next by Author: RE: phone interviews
Previous by Thread: Re: phone interviews
Next by Thread: RE: phone interviews

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads