RE: Myers-Briggs survey results (long)

Subject: RE: Myers-Briggs survey results (long)
From: "John Posada" <JPosada -at- isogon -dot- com>
To: <lyndsey -dot- amott -at- docsymmetry -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:36:41 -0500

How about there are 4,972 tech writers busy as hell and if we see one
more "just-for-fun" survey that doesn't make us or our management money,
we're gonna go postal?

John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
Isogon Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: lyndsey -dot- amott -at- docsymmetry -dot- com
[mailto:lyndsey -dot- amott -at- docsymmetry -dot- com]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 3:21 PM
Subject: Myers-Briggs survey results (long)

1. There are 5,000 subscribers to TECHWR-L. I received 28 responses, a
response rate of, er, well, somebody else will have to do the math.
Possible Conclusions:
a) Only 28 techwriters have done the Myers-Briggs test
b) There are not really 5,000 subscribers to the list
c) There are 5,000 subscribers, but hardly anyone actually reads the
d) People feel that revealing their Myers-Briggs type is akin to wearing
a see-through blouse to work
e) Ho hum, Myers-Briggs is soooooo booooooooring
f) There are 4972 lurkers on this list, all of whom are terrified of


Previous by Author: RE: Word 2003 - Bookmark Cross-reference List
Next by Author: RE: Myers-Briggs survey results (long)
Previous by Thread: Myers-Briggs survey results (long)
Next by Thread: Re: Myers-Briggs survey results (long)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads