[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: IT documentation

Subject: Re: IT documentation
From: "Doc" <doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:14:49 -0800


> Maybe I'm missing something here. Is "agile" development haphazard by
> definition?


It sounds like a rationalization for putting prototypes into production. As
long as they're making changes right up until delivery, that *IS* what it
is. Is is is.




References:
RE: IT documentation: From: Goldstein, Dan

Previous by Author: Re: Integrating documentation and training
Next by Author: Re: Promotion (was RE: IT documentation
Previous by Thread: Re: IT documentation
Next by Thread: RE: IT documentation

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads