RE: finally! a non-economics question!

Subject: RE: finally! a non-economics question!
From: "Karen E. Black" <kblack_text -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:13:57 -0500

In data modelling (we're spelling Canadian here), it's "associate to."

Sad to say...

From: "Wright, Lynne" <lwright -at- positron911 -dot- com>
I'm editing a manual by a writer who keeps using "associate to"... i've seen
it so many times, I can't tell any more whether its acceptable usage not...
as in the following statement:

"Use this section to associate telephone lines to access buttons."

MSN Premium with Virus Guard and Firewall* from McAfee® Security : 2 months FREE*


ROBOHELP IS THE INDUSTRY STANDARD IN HELP AUTHORING New RoboHelp X5 includes all new features such as, content management, multi-author support, distributed
workforce support, XML and PDF support, and much more!

Purchase new Macromedia RoboHelp X5 by March 31st and receive a $100 mail-in rebate.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: If the job posting gives you a headache, what could the job be like?
Next by Author: RE: Who WRITES these things anyway?????
Previous by Thread: Re: finally! a non-economics question!
Next by Thread: RE: finally! a non-economics question!

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads