Subject: RE: "DO NOT COOK"?
From: Brian Barker <b -dot- m -dot- barker -at- btinternet -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 09:31:57 +0000

At 21:20 12/03/2004, MaggiRos wrote:

Instead of DO NOT COOK (I can heat it up if I want to, dammit) why not, "This product is not meant to be cooked." Or " meant to be eaten cold." (Who cooks pb&j?)

Eaten cold is not the same things as uncooked, of course: cold cinders are no more palatable than hot ones.

Brian Barker
b -dot- m -dot- barker -at- btinternet -dot- com


ROBOHELP FOR FRAMEMAKER AS LOW AS $299! Offer expires March 31.
Publish your FrameMaker documents online -- quickly and easily!
New licenses are only $899 for one and $499 for additional licenses.
Use a competitor's product? Switch to RoboHelp for FrameMaker
for only $299! Buy today: CALL 1-800-462-4420 or 1 858-847-7900.
Hurry, offer expires March 31 2004.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: "DO NOT COOK"?: From: Jones, Donna
RE: "DO NOT COOK"?: From: MaggiRos

Previous by Author: Re: "DO NOT COOK"?
Next by Author: re: templates in DW
Previous by Thread: RE: "DO NOT COOK"?
Next by Thread: Re: "DO NOT COOK"?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads