Re: WebWorks vs. RoboHelp

Subject: Re: WebWorks vs. RoboHelp
From: TechComm Dood <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:24:11 -0400

Go with WebWorks Publisher. It's a mature product, it works, and
unlike RoboHelp for FrameMaker, it's still available for purchase.

Both products work pretty much the same way, and both now sport UIs
that really require no tweaking beyond them. But, WWP has its sea
legs, has a faithful, helpful, and knowledgeable user base, and
produces damn good output, as advertised.


ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!

COMPONENTONE DOC-TO-HELP 7 PROFESSIONAL: From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed documentation. New version offers yearly subscription service, Natural Search, Modular TOC Utility, Image Map Editor, Theme Designer, Context String Editor, plus more. .

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

WebWorks vs. RoboHelp: From: Michele Guthrie
Re: WebWorks vs. RoboHelp: From: David Knopf
Re: WebWorks vs. RoboHelp: From: Amram
Re: WebWorks vs. RoboHelp: From: David Knopf
Re: WebWorks vs. RoboHelp: From: T.W. Smith

Previous by Author: Re: Acrobat PDF bookmarks not shown
Next by Author: Re: WebWorks vs. RoboHelp
Previous by Thread: Re: WebWorks vs. RoboHelp
Next by Thread: Re: WebWorks vs. RoboHelp

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads