Re: Dorky grammar question

["Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>]

This discussion is degenerating into a debate that no user should ever
have to wonder about, which tells me that regardless of which of us is
right, some other word than "set" should be used to describe rules that 
don't have to be used *as* a set.  But I would argue that the individual 
rules that make up a ruleset do not define anything unless they are used 
with the rest of the rules as a set, and that when used individually they 
do not constitute a set.

I would also be interested in knowing if Mom really did see the entire
sentence of if she just got the same phrase the rest of us did.

Gene Kim-Eng



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.732 / Virus Database: 486 - Release Date: 7/29/2004

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l 

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.