Re: Fonts?

Subject: Re: Fonts?
From: Bruce Byfield <bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:47:48 -0700

Quoting Dick Margulis <margulisd -at- comcast -dot- net>:

> That's absurd. What was safe and more or less eternal in 1880 or 1920 or
> 1950 or 1980 looks dated today; and there is no reason to suspect that
> what is safe and more or less eternal won't look dated ten years from now.

Of course, there's always Caslon ;-)

Bruce Byfield


ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: Fonts?: From: Wright, Lynne
Re: Fonts?: From: Dick Margulis

Previous by Author: RE: Fonts?
Next by Author: RE: Fonts?
Previous by Thread: Re: Fonts?
Next by Thread: RE: Fonts?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads