Re: Multi-purpose / Single source

Subject: Re: Multi-purpose / Single source
From: "T.W. Smith" <techwordsmith -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:36:35 -0500


IMHO, XML is overkill if the FrameMaker GUI or FM + WWP 2003 GUIs
efficiently do what you need. The reason I think that is I sense a
need to author in a document-unfriendly package and then add a
database and/or custom programming ... of course, I may be
overthinking the complexity of the XML stuff, but if it's not complex,
use the efficiencies FM + WWP give.

Again, IMHO.

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:30:25 -0800, Sharon Burton <snip>
> XML is, in my case, too much. I'm doing much of what the original poster is
> looking for. I have 5 books, all with some or many of the chapters from the main
> book. Not all rebrands have all the product parts. Variables are used for all
> product names and product parts. It's easy to swap them out with a master file
> for each sub that only has their product names listed. I work in the main book
> until it's time to generate the rebranded subs, then I open the first rebranded
> book. I start hiding and showing conditions and swapping out variables.

======
T.

Remember, this is online. Take everything with a mine of salt and a grin.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5 - SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION!

RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward in Help authoring technology, featuring all new Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! View an online demo: http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: Multi-purpose / Single source: From: David Neeley
Re: Multi-purpose / Single source: From: Sharon Burton

Previous by Author: Re: Multi-purpose / Single source
Next by Author: Re: Multi-purpose / Single source
Previous by Thread: Re: Multi-purpose / Single source
Next by Thread: Re: Multi-purpose / Single source


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads