Re: Giving a surprise test to interviewees?

Subject: Re: Giving a surprise test to interviewees?
From: Dick Margulis <margulisd -at- comcast -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:34:38 -0500

Anthony Davey wrote:

As for the other interviwee who thinks this is discriminatory, ask her to explain her case in five sentences. And then review whether or not she should be on the interview panel for this post!

What's wrong with discrimination? I thought the entire _purpose_ of conducting interviews was to discriminate--to rank candidates according to their suitability for the job. If you're not going to discriminate among candidates, why not just hire the first person who shows up? Yes, a test is discriminatory; and bully for that!


Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:

Your Ad Here! Have a product or service you'd like to get some attention for? Use this space to get the word out! Contact lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com for more details.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: Giving a surprise test to interviewees?: From: Anthony Davey

Previous by Author: Re: Books cheap
Next by Author: Re: Use of "and/or"
Previous by Thread: Re: Giving a surprise test to interviewees?
Next by Thread: Re: Giving a surprise test to interviewees?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads