Re: "Transparent to the User"

Subject: Re: "Transparent to the User"
From: Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:08:50 -0400

Not Wonder Woman's jet? ;-)


I guess my point still stands: ask your SME what was meant by
"transparent to the user" because we on-list don't know for certain
what your SME might have meant, and we could (and probably will) share
our opinions on it all day with no benefit to you or your needs. ;-)

On Apr 7, 2005 12:43 PM, Spitzer, Judd L <judd -dot- l -dot- spitzer -at- lmco -dot- com> wrote:
> When I think of something being transparent to the user, I think of it
> as an operation that may be necessary for the user to complete other
> tasks and it happens without the user's knowledge or intervention.
> -Judd Spitzer


Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: "Transparent to the User": From: Spitzer, Judd L

Previous by Author: Re: "Transparent to the User"
Next by Author: Re: FM + WWP SE + RH -> HTML -- Boston sig meeting, anyone going?
Previous by Thread: RE: "Transparent to the User"
Next by Thread: RE: "Transparent to the User"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads