Re: writing an SDK

Subject: Re: writing an SDK
From: Chris Gooch <chris -dot- gooch -at- lightworkdesign -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:16:01 +0100




Well I took a bit of a kicking there didn't I?

Guy wrote:

> Go to Google and ask it
> define: sdk

Hmm... ok

from http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/S/SDK.html

++
SDK: Short for software development kit, a programming package that enables
a programmer to develop applications for a specific platform. Typically an
SDK includes one or more APIs, programming tools, and documentation.
++

Or then of course somone mentioned Gordon & Gordon's
course on writing API docs, here's a quick summary they
did for the STC:

http://www.stc-israel.org.il/archive/gordon_api_sdk.htm

++
Question: What is the difference between an application programming
interface and a software development kit?
Answer: Documentation, mostly.
++

Bill said:

> No, your statement that "an SDK is an API with docs" is completely
incorrect.
>
> There is a big difference between a SDK (software development kit) and
> an API (application programming interface). The former allows you to
> develop applications. The latter allows you to leverage third party
> functionality via function calls into a 3rd party component from
> within the application you're developing. The two are very, very
> different.

Look, I don't want to be all defensive, but this is misleading. You develop
applications by making calls to third party libraries; e.g., WIndows,
LightWorks,
OpenGL, etc. Whether they are "third party" or related to the operating
system
is not relevant to whether something is an API or an SDK. Likewise there's
no reason why a compiler or IDE that a programmer uses has to be supplied
by the same people as the operating system, hardware, or multiple third
party
APIs. An SDK is _not_ the same as a programming environment / compiler /
IDE. Which is not to say that an SDK wouldn't have to include some
compilation tools if it were not compiled as a set of libraries that can
be linked to directly on the developer's intended platform (which I think is
what Susan Gallaghers piece is trying to say).

I think there are enough angels on this particular pin now.

Chris.

Christopher Gooch, Technical Author
LightWork Design, Sheffield, UK.
www.lightworkdesign.com


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: writing an SDK
Next by Author: Microsoft Excel to FrameMaker Conversion
Previous by Thread: Re: writing an SDK
Next by Thread: Re: writing an SDK


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads