Re: Proof of what? Was I have proof

Subject: Re: Proof of what? Was I have proof
From: Bruce Byfield <bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:38:29 -0700


HBacheler -at- aol -dot- com wrote:

Growing "Old" is mandatory

Actually, there is an alternative. But it's even worse.

--
Bruce Byfield 604-421-7177
http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Re: Proof of what? Was I have proof: From: HBacheler

Previous by Author: Re: Conversion of video formats
Next by Author: Re: What should one do with split infinitives?
Previous by Thread: RE: Proof of what? Was I have proof
Next by Thread: Re: Proof of what? Was I have proof


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads