Re: Citations for ragged (natural) right margin?
I rarely disagree with Leah, but I have to say that this statement is nonsense as written. It's true in the absolute sense only if you restrict your discussion to full justification without hyphenation, where you can end up with horrible rivers, and it's arguably true if the context is (as noted in the quoted excerpt) early-90s automated justification in Word and other word processors.
I'm a fan of ragged-right, and have been for years. However, it is possible to produce river-less full-justified text even in a monospace font, if
1. the client requires it, and
2. the writer has a bit of skill and
3. a lot of time on his or her hands.
See "How to justify type", the opening discussion at http://allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?Art_Sackett
---- Jerry Muelver
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
Previous by Author:
Re: Why should I be worried about the merger? NOT
Next by Author: Re: watch your language! (or don't)
Previous by Thread: Citations for ragged (natural) right margin?
Next by Thread: Re: Citations for ragged (natural) right margin
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites