Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)

Subject: Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 07:28:15 -0700

It can also have to do with the way you work. If you're a 1099
contractor, or a W2 employee working for a client through an
agency, in the eyes of the client company you are a vendor, not an employee, and in most companies the HR restriction against managers giving references to former employees does not apply to vendors.
Gene Kim-Eng

----- Original Message ----- From: "John Posada" <jposada01 -at- yahoo -dot- com>

I've never experienced that...however, maybe it's because of how I
deal withy references.


Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?): From: John Posada

Previous by Author: Re: Project 11 and Certification: A Possibility
Next by Author: Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)
Previous by Thread: Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)
Next by Thread: RE: References (was: Why discuss certification?)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads