Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)

Subject: Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)
From: Michele <michele -at- krautgrrl -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 15:40:28 -0500

Now you're using logic which HR banned two months ago. Besides anal-retentive recruiters I haven't had anyone call any of my references for years, but I'm a consultant, so, perhaps, my experience could be simply because I don't work captive.


Michele E. Davis, Writer
Kraut Companies
612-309-6903 (cell)
and the uber geek empyre

Secara, Maggie wrote:

So, does the company that refuses to give references not ASK for
references when hiring? Where do they expect them to come from?


Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: References (was: Why discuss certification?): From: Secara, Maggie

Previous by Author: WAS Paragraph numbering - industry standard? NOW Tech Book Organization
Next by Author: RE: Is RoboHelp still a viable way to go for help?
Previous by Thread: RE: References (was: Why discuss certification?)
Next by Thread: RE: References (was: Why discuss certification?)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads