Re: Agile programming

Subject: Re: Agile programming
From: David Neeley <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:02:27 -0500

A minor quibble for those who aren't familiar with ISO--it isn't a
regulatory body and certification is strictly optional for those who
wish to gain the recognition that ISO certification may entail.

People who are much more current than am I regarding ISO cert issues
often claim that it can enshrine processes that often should instead
be replaced as being cumbersome and unnecessarily costly.


On 8/5/05, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:
> There won't be any more calls
> for writers "certified" in the new regulations than there now
> are for writers "certified" in regulatory environments like ISO
> or SOX.


Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Agile programming: From: Brian Gordon
Re: Agile programming: From: Gene Kim-Eng

Previous by Author: Re: Paragraph numbering - industry standard?
Next by Author: Re: Agile programming
Previous by Thread: Re: Agile programming
Next by Thread: RE: Agile programming

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads