Re: Agile programming

Subject: Re: Agile programming
From: quills -at- airmail -dot- net
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 14:00:21 -0500 (CDT)

David is right about this. ISO only requires that you document what you
do. Quality is your own low standard. What is pathetic, is that many ISO
certified companies can't meet their own low standards. They often require
ludicrous procedures to be fulfilled for the simplest processes.

Complexity is often mistaken for quality.


> A minor quibble for those who aren't familiar with ISO--it isn't a
> regulatory body and certification is strictly optional for those who
> wish to gain the recognition that ISO certification may entail.
> People who are much more current than am I regarding ISO cert issues
> often claim that it can enshrine processes that often should instead
> be replaced as being cumbersome and unnecessarily costly.


Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Agile programming: From: Brian Gordon
Re: Agile programming: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Agile programming: From: David Neeley

Previous by Author: RE: What do people work from - more
Next by Author: RE: Is RoboHelp still a viable way to go for help?
Previous by Thread: Re: Agile programming
Next by Thread: Re: Agile programming

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads