TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Grammar: "So" as a modifier From:"Nuckols, Kenneth M" <Kenneth -dot- Nuckols -at- mybrighthouse -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 7 Oct 2005 07:29:58 -0400
Maggie Secara said...
> This is yet another sense. You could easily have that same
> with "too" instead of "so". (We are, too!) I have never known why that
> "too" is an affirmative, but it is. But it's different from "We are so
> in trouble."
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bonnie Granat
> > Al: We are not lost.
> > Meg: We are *so* lost.
> > Al: Are not!
> > Meg: Are SO!
> > "We are so lost" = "We are totally lost"
> > I don't think "very" fits with being lost.
Or, if people talked the way your high school English teacher wanted you
to write, you could substitute *so* with *indeed* (we are indeed lost).
But as careful and precise a writer or speaker as a person might be,
I've never heard anyone (other than characters on a show like The West
Wing) conduct a heated argument using "formal" grammar. Honestly I don't
think I could do it with a straight face...
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, purge it and do not disseminate or copy it.
Try WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word today! Smooth migration of legacy
RoboHelp content into your new Help systems. EContent Magazine Decision-
maker review (October 2005) is here: http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.