TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Grammar: "So" as a modifier From:"Downing, David" <DavidDowning -at- Users -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:27:03 -0400
Off the top of my head, I'd say this was a matter of the degree of
formality. In informal usage, this would be perfectly fine, but not in
a technical manual.
From: arroxaneullman -at- aol -dot- com [mailto:arroxaneullman -at- aol -dot- com]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 5:10 PM
Subject: Grammar: "So" as a modifier
Another interesting grammatical conversation came up today. This time
we discussed "so" as a modifier. For example, "We are so lost" (instead
of "very?) or "That is so an inconvenience" (instead of "such"?). I
commented that this usage was incorrect, but really can't back it up
with a grammatical rule.
If a grammatical rule for this situation exists, I have forgotten it.
If it is acceptable, why does it sound so wrong? (Yes, I intentionally
used it in a common phrase.)
FYI, the explanation in my Merriam-Webster's
_Concise_Dictionary_of_English_Usage is rather roundabout and
long-winded. What I gleaned is that it's antiquated, yet it appears to
be recently revived in youth culture.
So, I'm just looking for a simple rule-of-thumb I can share with my
grammatically handicapped peers.
Thanks to the TW Grammarians!
The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
delete the material from any system and destroy any copies.
This email message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by NetIQ MailMarshal
Try WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word today! Smooth migration of legacy
RoboHelp content into your new Help systems. EContent Magazine Decision-
maker review (October 2005) is here: http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.