RE: The Bible in Tech Comm

Subject: RE: The Bible in Tech Comm
From: John Posada <jposada01 -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:21:36 -0700 (PDT)

> In my college days I attended a course that has an official title:
> "Loopholes in the Bible" (Philosophy credit). I think that
> anything that has official studies of its "loopholes" would not
> be a model for ideal technical communication.

Haven't you ever done a gap analysis of a technical document? Does
doing one negate the fact that it is still a technical document?

My first year English teacher did several months examining the
phallic symbolism of works such as Moby Dick, Gone with the Wind
(don't ask), and several other literary classics. By the time she was
done, you'd have thought they were XXX screenplays. Does that make
them less "classic literature".

John Posada
Senior Technical Writer

"What do we want? More than
anybody else has."
Steve Ballmer


Try WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word today! Smooth migration of legacy
RoboHelp content into your new Help systems. EContent Magazine Decision-
maker review (October 2005) is here:

Doc-To-Help 2005 converts RoboHelp files with one click. Author with Word or any HTML editor. Visit our site to see a conversion demo movie and learn more.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


RE: The Bible in Tech Comm: From: Chad LaCroix

Previous by Author: Re: is "technologies" a word?
Next by Author: Re: The Bible in Tech Comm
Previous by Thread: RE: The Bible in Tech Comm
Next by Thread: Re: The Bible in Tech Comm

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads