Re: The Bible in Tech Comm

Subject: Re: The Bible in Tech Comm
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:39:00 -0700

----- Original Message ----- From: "John Posada" <jposada01 -at- yahoo -dot- com>

Haven't you ever done a gap analysis of a technical document? Does
doing one negate the fact that it is still a technical document?

Most of the documents we create have gaps in them somewhere.
Usually, they're due to compromises we were forced to make for
time and/or budget. That doesn't negate the fact that they're still
technical documents, but I wouldn't present them as "models for
ideal technical communication."



Try WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word today! Smooth migration of legacy
RoboHelp content into your new Help systems. EContent Magazine Decision-
maker review (October 2005) is here:

Doc-To-Help 2005 converts RoboHelp files with one click. Author with Word or any HTML editor. Visit our site to see a conversion demo movie and learn more.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


RE: The Bible in Tech Comm: From: John Posada

Previous by Author: Re: is "technologies" a word?
Next by Author: Re: Writing Samples and Confidential/Internal Use Publications
Previous by Thread: RE: The Bible in Tech Comm
Next by Thread: Re: The Bible in Tech Comm

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads