Re: Are You Sure? (Fri.)

Subject: Re: Are You Sure? (Fri.)
From: Peter Neilson <neilson -at- alltel -dot- net>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:08:41 -0500

It used to be that the tech writer did the real QA while the QA
department fiddled with tests derived from the same misunderstood
criteria that went into designing the system.

Now the tech writer is brought in for just two months, saving a
lot of money. Yes, several thousand dollars, at least.

It is possible to save even more, by having the tech writer work
on the design from the beginning. I wonder if anyone does that?

Dan Goldstein wrote:

How much would it have cost to run proper QA on the software before they
implemented it, in order to account for potential user errors? Several
thousand dollars?


Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No proprietary editor! *August release.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


RE: Are You Sure? (Fri.): From: Dan Goldstein

Previous by Author: Re: what are you working on today
Next by Author: Re: Rule of thumb for doc time based on development time?
Previous by Thread: RE: Are You Sure? (Fri.)
Next by Thread: Re: Are You Sure? (Fri.)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads