TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: FrameMaker training From:"CB Casper" <knowone -at- surfy -dot- net> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:01:18 -0800
>> Question: How much emphasis do you feel should be
placed on learning structured Framemaker. <<
I moved from Interleaf to structured FrameMaker in
an environment that produces a huge amount of docs
from many departments for multiple products. They
have a legitimate desire for the hundreds of docs
to have a simliar look and feel to their presentation.
Structured FrameMaker limits the ability of individual
authors to get creative with the company style.
After a couple of years of using structured FM, I was
given a unstructured FM doc to make some major
I gave up using unstructured FM and converted it to
structured. I was too well versed in structured and
the lack of it was too frustrating. I knew how to
get what was needed in the structured environment,
but not in unstructured.
So the answer is, from a training perspective,
authors need to learn both.
CB - who will be moving away from FM to XML one of
Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l